🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.